Meeting
Tower Website Design Discussion
Gist
First real design conversation with Tower Leadership about rebuilding their site, following a prior day's call between Chris and Laura McDade. Chris pitched his LEGO-block design system approach and code-first workflow, and Tower Leadership laid out their budget constraint (~$12-13k already spent, want the remaining ~25 pages finished) against Chris's $15k minimum for an 8-week rebuild. They agreed Chris would send a simple scope-of-work-as-contract and Laura would forward sample pages Claude had drafted so Chris could test them against his content-import process, with a possible kickoff the following week.
Distilled from the transcript by claude-sonnet-5 · Jul 25
What came out of it
Decisions2
- Chris will send a simplified scope-of-work document that will double as the contract.
- Tower Leadership will provide previous work examples and site links for Chris to review.
Risks and blockers3
- Tower Leadership's existing site was built by a team that mixed graphic design and UX design without a proper design system, creating inconsistent pages.
- Budget of ~$12-13k is below Chris's stated $15k minimum, requiring scope prioritization.
- Brand colors (yellow, blue) may need adjustment for WCAG/ADA accessibility and colorblind compliance.
Open questions3
- Will the finalized scope and pricing fit within Tower Leadership's remaining budget?
- Will a second phase be needed to elevate pages beyond the initial cleanup?
- Do Go High Level landing pages need to connect to the main site?
Next steps4
- MeSend scope-of-work/contract document to Tower Leadership
- MeSend examples of previous website design work
- ClientForward additional sample pages drafted with Claude for content import testing
- UnassignedSchedule a project kickoff for the following week
A record of what was agreed, not a task list — nothing here was scheduled.
From this meeting
No tasks spawned from this meeting.
Notes
No notes on this meeting yet. Use the plus Note button to add one.